Which avalanche transceiver should I buy?

Whether you’re buying for the first time or updating an older device, here are a few tips.

If you want to enter snow sports off the secured slopes, then you need an avalanche transceiver (avalanche victim search device, or LVS) in addition to a probe and shovel. While there are fairly clear criteria for selecting a usable product for shovels and probes, it is a bit more complex with avalanche transceivers. A very good help here is the avalanche transceiver test by the DAV Sicherheitsforschung [German Alpine Club Safety Research]. Based on this, you can get a good picture. We will now add a few points that we have regularly observed in our scenarios on the courses.

Our observations:

  • Practicing in the field is the be-all and end-all. Even the best device is of little help if you can’t handle it properly. And you can make a mistake in almost every section of the search. It is definitely recommended not only to test the functions on the soccer field, but to really try the device in the snow. Including signal search, multiple burials, deep burials and a portion of stress.

  • The range is more relevant than you might think. While you can perfect the operation and hidden pitfalls of the devices with training or eliminate errors, the range will not improve even with the hundredth scenario. Therefore, the better range is a clear buying argument. Standing without a signal in an emergency is a really bad situation. The sooner you receive a signal, the better you get into a regulated process and the faster the search is completed.

  • The devices are constantly evolving. Don’t buy old devices just to save money. The avalanche transceiver can be decisive whether your buddy survives or not. In our opinion, a 10-year-old device simply needs to be replaced. The reason for this cannot be attributed to a single point, but the flaws of the new devices are simply much smaller. Here are a few examples. Better range in signal search in poor coupling positions. Better visualization and faster distance update in the coarse search, which allows you to move faster. Higher accuracy in the fine search, especially with regard to depth of burial. And less influence of electronic interference on the search. As mentioned in the first point, a very good understanding of the device and regular practice can compensate for these weaknesses, but you will still perform better with a new device.

  • Usability must be Simple and Stupid. Nobody needs any extra features outside of the main functions. The avalanche transceiver only has to be able to do two things, and these as well as possible. Send and search. Ok, we also want a group check and marking function, but that’s it. Nobody needs an inclinometer on the avalanche transceiver. The device must be self-explanatory in handling, otherwise you will make mistakes under stress. Replacing buttons with sensors, or assigning double functions to buttons are unnecessary sources of error in an emergency. The device operation must be subconscious.

  • Voice control is only for people who never practice with the device. Anyone who can handle their device is more likely to be thrown off by the verbal announcements than helped by them.

  • Interference from electronic devices is real and extremely relevant, especially when searching. EVERY avalanche transceiver is disturbed by devices such as cell phones, smartwatches, batteries, etc. And you can go so far as to say that the devices become almost unusable due to the interference. Avalanche transceivers with Interference Protection Systems can better deal with interference sources, but cannot eliminate them either. Therefore, especially in the signal search, make sure that the cell phone is far enough away (50cm) and that there are no smartwatches or heated gloves on the search hand. Modern devices show the interference on the display with small symbols.

Our favorites

Guides Choice: Pieps Pro IPS

The manufacturer says: PIEPS IPS technology takes avalanche transceivers to a new level: The PRO IPS offers maximum range and signal precision, even under the most difficult conditions – developed for professionals and guides who need full control. And we can fully agree here. It is the device that we as guides currently use. It is at the forefront in all areas, and operation under stress is very intuitive and very easy to do even with gloves. Unfold the antenna and you’re done. A minor disadvantage could be the hard-to-press button for the group check function. But you’re not under any stress here. So you’re doing everything right with this device. If it’s beyond your budget, here are some cheaper alternatives with compromises.

Pieps Mini IPS or Arva Evo BT

The Pieps MINI IPS is aimed at beginners and all those who appreciate a simple, robust and reliable device. Despite a somewhat shorter range, it impresses with safe signal guidance, interference protection and a price-performance ratio that is unbeatable. Slightly more expensive, with slightly better range and otherwise similar performance, the Arva EVO BT is also worth recommending. While we rated the predecessor EVO5 as rather unusable, the EVO BT is now a really solid device in this price range.

Other devices that we recommend, or not.

The company Mammut has been delivering very, very solid devices for years. And if it weren’t for the Pieps Pro IPS, we would most likely be on the road with the Mammut Barryvox S2. The predecessor of this device was also top and is currently definitely worth a price tip. Pay attention to the sometimes stronger susceptibility to electronic interference and the somewhat ‘slower’ coarse search. Otherwise, as I said, the Barryvox S1 is also a top device. We can also fully recommend the Arva Neo BT Pro.

We would keep our fingers away from the Ortovox devices, primarily because of the simply too short range and from the BCA devices. It simply doesn’t make sense to buy these when the market offers significantly better options. At this point, it should be noted that Ortovox and BCA both have very cool shovels and probes. Only the avalanche transceiver is a bit of a problem. Ortovox also currently offers the best avalanche booklets in which the most important avalanche content is very well summarized.

Are you considering replacing your old device? Here is a current article on this topic. Devices from practice that we would replace in your place are the following: Everything older than 10 years. Everything from Ortovox and BCA, the Neo series from Arva (except the new BT), Mammut Barryvox Pulse and Element, as well as devices from the Pieps DSP and Micro series.

What should I look for in a shovel and probe?

For the sake of completeness, we would like to mention a few critical features that shovels and probes should definitely have. If something is missing from the following points, we recommend an upgrade.

A probe needs:

  • At least 240cm length
  • A solid locking mechanism for tensioning. Tying a knot does not count as solid
  • A readable depth marking on the probe
  • The larger the diameter, the better the handling

A decent shovel has the following features:

  • Stable shovel blade, so no plastic
  • Extendable handle
  • Guides and stops for automatic locking during assembly

Almost all manufacturers have very good products here. It is worth taking the material in your hand in the sports store and comparing how it is from the handling and how it lies in the hand. Don’t buy the low budget versions here. You have a decent shovel almost forever.